Right! Ward 5. City Council Rep Jeremiah Ellison is not running for re-election. On the ballot:
Jovan Northington
Maurice L. Ward
Ethrophic Burnett
Pearll Warren
Miles G. Wilson
Anndrea Young
The tl;dr: I would rank Ethrophic Burnett first, Anndrea Young second.
As I did in my Ward 2 post, I’m going to talk briefly about all the PACs because they have similar names and it’s frankly pretty confusing.
- There was We Love Mpls. Presumably called that because so many of them love Minneapolis, but don’t live there. (Obligatory note: neither do I, but at least I live in St. Paul and not, say, Wayzata.) Taylor Dahlin wrote about We Love Minneapolis in June. She noted that it’s chaired by (GOP donor) Andrea Corbin, and run by Joe Radinovich and Nico Woods. (Two of the most conservative people in the Minnesota DFL.) The money overwhelmingly came from landlords with large holdings; progressive PAC Minneapolis for the Many noted that 68% of their money came from landlords responsible for hundreds of property violations.
- There is Thrive Minneapolis. In July, We Love Mpls shut down and Thrive Minneapolis seems to be the replacement. Taylor wrote about this group in July. She noted that it’s chaired by Martha Holton Dimick (the very conservative prosecutor who ran against Mary Moriarty in 2022), and again heavily funded by landlords and developers, many of whom do not live in Minneapolis.
- There is All of Mpls, which is doing endorsements. Legally I am sure they are not actually the Frey campaign wearing a funny hat but if you click on the website you might be forgiven for thinking they basically look like the Frey campaign wearing a funny hat, especially since they have a link to “Thank Mayor Frey” (with a canned, adulatory e-mail). They have endorsed Becka Thompson in Ward 12, which is frankly inexcusable, and if I were Pearll Warren, I’d be pretty annoyed about that. I described them two years ago as “a group aligned with the law-and-order faction of the city government: they love cops, they love landlords, and they love parking spots.” In retrospect I’m not sure that’s harsh enough. What they want is for Mayor Frey, who is frankly incompetent even if you like his politics, to have a rubber-stamp City Council.
- On the other side there is the progressive PAC Minneapolis for the Many. I like Minneapolis for the Many! They also do endorsements.
One final note about some of the people involved in Love/Thrive/All Of Mpls. On September 9th there was a Zoom meeting of the DFL Feminist Caucus where the people in charge and their friends engaged in some really gross treatment of trans Democrats who showed up and ran for offices. (There’s an open letter about what happened at that meeting here.) Joe Radinovich was there and voting with the hostile majority. Martha Holton Dimick nominated Latonya Reeves, who was one of the people huffing and eye-rolling over the concept of respecting someone’s pronouns. The people misgendering trans DFLers are out of step with things I consider to be core DFL values. If someone has sought and accepted these endorsements, I do not trust them. (Also, the reason the old guard of the DFL Feminist Caucus closed ranks was to defend the right of their friend to continue to hold party office despite her involvement in a fatal crash that has been charged as vehicular homicide. I’ve seen this sort of “how dare you show up in our clubhouse and make trouble” gatekeeping in other contexts and it’s toxic and awful.)
All this is important context because there’s a Minneapolis for the Many candidate in this race (Ethrophic), an All of Mpls candidate (Pearll), a backup All of Mpls candidate (Miles), and then three others, two of whom are too disorganized to take seriously (Jovan and Maurice) and then one who I would say is a reasonable second-choice for progressive voters (Anndrea).
Jovan Northington lists websites at both jovan4ward5.org and westrongertogether.org, neither of which works. I e-mailed him and he got back to me with the jovan4ward5.com address, where I found a graphics that show the nonfunctional .org address. He is involved with what may be a nonprofit called “Strength Group” (or maybe it’s just a Facebook page? the westrongertogether.org address is supposed to be their website but again, it’s not working.) He filled out the We Love Mpls candidate screening questionnaire. An important piece of context here is that this questionnaire was done with a web questionnaire that used a lot of radio-button-style click-to-choose options. From the free-response sections, he wants to build “small business resilience incubator hubs” in downtown buildings; provide grants and loans to small businesses; and he would deal with encampments by hiring private security and posting no-trespassing signs.
Maurice Ward’s website calls him “the People’s Choice,” but the only person who seems to have endorsed him is Jarmel Perry (and the bit about the endorsement quotes Maurice talking about Jarmel, rather than Jarmel talking about Maurice). This article in the Spokesman-Recorder made a much better case for him than his website does: he’s a formerly incarcerated person who started a nonprofit, JIIVE (Justice-Impacted Individuals Voting Effectively) that has created community gardens for formerly incarcerated people and is advocating for the creation of gardens at prisons to give prisoners the opportunity to grow food and eat more fresh produce.
I was curious what exactly he did to wind up incarcerated and turned up this Star Tribune article (it’s sure striking how the way we talk about this stuff has changed in fifteen years. Pretty sure the Star Trib wouldn’t have a headline talking about a “juvenile hooker ring” these days.) Maurice served 12.5 years, according to the information in a Star Tribune editorial he co-wrote last year. (Can I just note: that’s a lot more time than was served by any of the white sex offenders I’ve known.) (“How many sex offenders have you known, Naomi?” Three men I’ve known personally, all of them white, have been convicted of sex offenses against children. Two got probation or suspended sentences with no time behind bars and one served less than six months.)
Anndrea answered both the Neighbors for More Neighbors questionnaire and the We Love Mpls questionnaire. Her answers on both are worth browsing (again, just be aware that the WLM questionnaire was heavily based around multiple-choice questions — I appreciate that Anndrea resolutely clicked mostly the ones that WLM clearly didn’t want you picking.) One of her central concerns is the problem of displacement (particularly around the coming Blue Line extension). I appreciate this because sometime back a candidate in Ward 6 talked about the problem of “gentrification” and said that we should frame the problem as displacement. It’s not that nice stuff is bad, it’s that the nice stuff should be available to the people in the area where it’s being built, rather than those people being shoved out of the way. She gives mostly very short answers on the Neighbors for More Neighbors questionnaire, but generally aligns with Ethrophic rather than Pearll. One note regarding the We Love Mpls questionnaire — they ask people to rate themselves on a liberal-to-conservative scale where the left side is 1 and the conservative side is 10. Anndrea rated herself an 8. I confirmed by e-mail that this was because she’d misread the question, she should have rated herself a 2.
Anndrea is endorsed by Brooklyn Park City Council rep Shelle Page, the group Run for Something, and she’s the second-choice ranking from SEIU.
Miles has a nice website (one of the two really nice websites), was funded by We Love Mpls but is not endorsed by All Of Mpls, and is rumored to have had his mom fill out questionnaires for him. In his We Love Mpls questionnaire he said (or his mom said) that he’s opposed to the separation ordinance that forbids Minneapolis city staff from asking people about their immigration status. I e-mailed him to ask if this reflects his actual views or if he misread something (this was before I ran across the gossip that his mom filled out the forms anyway, but tbh this is still a reasonable question, is this what he actually believes or a mistake in filling out the form? I have not heard back from him yet.) I would describe his overall set of responses in the We Love Mpls form to be sympathetic towards police, less sympathetic towards landlords (he thinks we need more cops more than we need more accountability for cops — that’s one of the “pick one” radio button answers — but he’s also pro-rent-control.)
His website emphasizes constituent services, transit, and public safety. There are no endorsements listed, which honestly I find pretty surprising. He’s apparently the backup All of Mpls candidate. Not sure if he’s got support from anywhere else.
Pearll Warren is the candidate endorsed by All of Mpls (and my read on this race is that it’s between her and Ethrophic, they’re the two people with money, endorsements, and volunteers.) She filled out both the We Love Mpls questionnaire and the Neighbors for More Neighbors questionnaire.
Pearll has a compelling background: she’s currently a Homeownership Development Manager for Habitat for Humanity, and has previously worked as a HUD housing counselor. One of her policy proposals that really startled me (which she mentions in both questionnaires) is that we should be addressing homelessness/encampments in part by using civil commitments to forcibly confine mentally ill people for treatment whether they agree to this or not. (“We also need to responsibly utilize civil commitment orders when necessary, to ensure those experiencing severe mental or emotional instability receive the care and stabilization they need. Compassionate intervention—not criminalization—is how we begin to address this crisis with the urgency and dignity it deserves.” — That’s in the NfMN questionnaire.) I kind of suspect that her attitude here has been shaped in part by the work she’s done.
I want to quickly make a couple of points about civil commitment:
- Our standard for civil commitment is that you can be placed under involuntary hold if you’re a danger to yourself or others, and you have to genuinely be a danger. I think this is a good standard.
- We do not have enough beds to provide mental health treatment to the people who are actively seeking mental health treatment, so the idea that we can solve homelessness with more involuntary holds strikes me as really questionable unless we’re going to put some sort of massive investment into high-security mental health treatment facilities.
- This seems like a singularly bad time to be ramping up involuntary confinement of people we’ve decided are mentally ill.
Moving on. She’s opposed to a Tenant Opportunity to Purchase Act on the grounds that “property owners should be able to sell their property to whom they choose to sell it to.” (I am not as anti-landlord as a lot of my friends but in general I’m more sympathetic to the people who will potentially lose their home than to the people who will potentially make less money on their investment, so I disagree with her on this.) On eviction protection, she says we should focus on root causes: “wages that don’t keep up with rent, rising living costs, and a lack of affordable options.” I mean, yes, this is all true, but part of why I’ve gone from “rent control is a terrible idea” to “actually maybe we should try some rent control” is stuff like price-fixing on the part of landlords, which makes it just about impossible for wages to keep up with rent. (She does in fact support rent control, with a bunch of caveats that I tend to agree with, like exemptions for new construction.)
One final thing I noticed that she brings up on the NfMN questionnaire is a concern about the location of the Blue Line extension (in her response to Question 3): “First and foremost, we have a train currently scheduled to run through North Minneapolis, up 21st Avenue—a route that would severely divide our community, particularly within the 5th Ward. I want to work closely with the Metropolitan Council to reroute the light rail up Olson Memorial Highway, connecting to Highway 100 and linking with suburban communities. This was the original plan, and our business corridor along Olson was dismantled with that purpose in mind. It’s time for that investment to serve its intended function.” You can see the proposed route here (and also leave comments). I don’t know enough about the geography of the area to say whether I think she’s right about this or not. (I do think that one of the fundamental things about building light rail is that people will object to literally anywhere you put it and if you try to find some sort of perfect location you’ll just never build it, and I really think North Minneapolis deserves a light rail extension, though.)
Ethrophic Burnett is a project manager for the City of Minneapolis and has worked for the city since 2018. Prior to that she worked for Urban Homeworks and the Northside Achievement Zone. She makes some specific commitments around responsiveness and constituent services (regular community office hours, and quarterly meetings with community leaders) (just about everyone mentions responsiveness and constituent services; it’s one of those things that’s easy to promise, hard to provide, and hard to evaluate from the outside.)
She did not respond to the We Love Mpls questionnaire but provided detailed responses to the Neighbors for More Neighbors questionnaire. She and Pearll diverge about where you’d expect: Ethrophic supports Tenant Opportunity to Purchase laws, she’s more positive toward rent control, and she’s opposed to encampment clearing (“Clearing encampments doesn’t solve homelessness, it just moves it around”).
Where Pearll is pretty direct about supporting civil commitment to deal with drug addiction, Ethrophic is pretty direct about harm reduction when she talks about how she’d handle homelessness: “That includes creating safe, sanctioned spaces with access to restrooms, sanitation, mental health and addiction services, and consistent engagement by trained city staff, not law enforcement.” (I am sort of assuming she’s talking here about creating a legal encampment site. I have mixed feelings about this solution, but it’s better than the thing where we fence off sidewalks to keep people from putting tents under bridges and periodically throw everyone’s stuff away.)
(Absolutely everyone agrees that the Avivo Village model is great and effective and gets a lot of people into housing who are not open to living in a traditional shelter. My question on this is, if everyone agrees that Avivo Village is fantastic, why are there not now a dozen similar places all over the metro? What’s the obstacle? I have written to Avivo’s press person and will report back at some point.)
Ethrophic is endorsed by Minneapolis for the Many, Take Action MN, Hennepin County Commissioners Irene Fernando and Angela Conley, and all the Ellisons. (Jeremiah, Keith, Kim.)
I would rank Ethrophic Burnett first and Anndrea Young second.
I have a new book coming out next June! This one is not YA; it’s a near-future thriller about an obstetrician who gets kidnapped by a cult because they want someone on site to deliver babies. You can pre-order it right now if you want.
I do not have a Patreon or Ko-Fi but instead encourage people who want to reward all my hard work to donate to fundraisers. This year I’m fundraising for YouthLink. YouthLink is a Minneapolis nonprofit that helps youth (ages 16-24) who are homeless or at risk of homelessness. (Here’s their website.) I have seen some of the work they do and been really impressed. (An early donor to the fundraiser added a comment: “YouthLink was incredible instrumental in my assistance of a friend to escape a bad family situation in Florida with little more than a computer and a state ID. Thanks to YouthLink and their knowledge of resources my friend was able to get a mailing address (which was essential in getting a debit card and formal identification documents), healthcare, hot meals, an internship at a local company, and even furniture for their new apartment.” — That is exactly the sort of thing I’m talking about!)
I set up a fundraiser with a specific goal mainly because seeing the money raised helps motivate me. (Having external motivation helps! This is a lot of work.)