This is always the ward I find the hardest to sort out, and it’s because there’s always a bunch of stuff happening in Somali, which I do not speak. I do my best, but even more than in other wards, there is stuff happening in the race that I just do not know about.
And even just on the English-language side, this is also an incredibly messy race. The tl;dr is that I think people should vote for Kayseh Magan.
Edited 2/2024: Hello, MN District 49A voters searching for information on Tiger Worku! Apparently he moved to Minnetonka and is s now running for legislature in your district. You can absolutely do better. I do not recommend supporting him for DFL endorsement, or in the primary. Details below!
In the “Progress” section of his website, something went wrong with the display and the “Homelessness” section looked like this when I pulled it up:
This struck me as humorously ironic, since what it suggests is, “I want to make a vague statement of goodwill towards homeless people, while demonstrably not really giving much of a shit.” (Which, you know … maybe that’s not irony. Maybe that’s just accurate?) To be fair, though, I use Firefox, and it might look OK in Chrome, so I pulled it up in Chrome for another look….
FYI, when I selected the text in Chrome, the rest of it came along, so that sentence is supposed to finish, “typically been responsible for addressing homelessness. If we are going to continue this progress, we need to work together toward solutions in good faith.” Even with all the text there, this is a real nothing of a statement, and when you say that homeless encampments pose “serious public and individual health risks” without acknowledging that the biggest health risk homelessness poses is to the people who are living in Minneapolis without homes, you’re being pretty goddamn shameless about the extent to which you think you serve the wealthy people who view homeless people as the central problem, rather than a lack of housing.
Also, under public safety, there’s this: “Public safety reform should be guided by the lived experience of officers and citizens, not just ideology. That’s why I make frequent visits to the First Precinct and listen to officers discuss their experiences on the job. We must reckon with the fact that we are down over 300 officers from pre-2019 levels, and that recruiting more officers cannot be fixed immediately, even with additional funding. Rebuilding the force will help restore community policing, reduce response times, and improve police-community relations. But there is so much more that we must do.” When you say, “Public safety reform should be guided by the lived experience of officers and citizens” and then talk at length and in detail about how much time you’ve spent listening to officers and have zero examples of listening to the people who are policed by those officers and all the rest of your rhetoric is about how hard things are for police officers and there’s not even any lip service about stuff like accountability: you have made your position and priorities really, really clear! This is why I do not like or trust you, Michael Rainville.
Marcus Mills is endorsed by the Green party, former City Council representatives Cam Gordon and Jeremy Schroeder, and former Mayoral candidate Sheila Nezhad. He has reasonably substantial local policy experience (an energy advisory committee, a community engagement commission, chair of the neighborhood association land use and development committee). On his issues page he talks about wanting participatory budgeting, solar panels on schools, and tenant protections (among other things — basically, his goals suggest that he’d be more aligned with the progressive wing of the City Council than Michael Rainville is.)
He also mentions playing D&D in his bio. I feel like there’s a whole set of jokes to be made here about the ways in which D&D does and doesn’t prepare you for serving on a City Council (on one hand: you’ve proved you’re capable of paying attention through long meetings. On the other hand: at a City Council meeting you don’t ever get to solve problems by casting Chain Lightning.)
His Facebook page has no new posts since June; his Events page turns up no events. So I am not sure how actively he’s campaigning. But he’ll be on the ballot, and I would absolutely vote for him.
I have a book coming out this fall, in November! Liberty’s Daughter is near-future SF about a teenage girl on a libertarian seastead. A lot of it was originally published as short fiction in The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction. You can pre-order it in either book or ebook format from whatever you like.
Here’s the question as it will appear on the ballot:
CITY QUESTION 1 (Minneapolis)
Government Structure: Executive Mayor – Legislative Council
Shall the Minneapolis City Charter be amended to adopt a change in its form of government to an Executive Mayor-Legislative Council structure to shift certain powers to the Mayor, consolidating administrative authority over all operating departments under the Mayor, and eliminating the Executive Committee?
The debate over what to do about public safety and policing is far and away the most central question in pretty much every other race this year in Minneapolis, including the Park Board races. But it’s also actually on the ballot and Minneapolis residents will be able to vote Yes or No on the question of whether to create a Department of Public Safety to replace MPD.
Here’s what’s appearing on the ballot — both a question, and an explanation:
CITY QUESTION 2 (Minneapolis)
Department of Public Safety
Shall the Minneapolis City Charter be amended to remove the Police Department and replace it with a Department of Public Safety that employs a comprehensive public health approach to the delivery of functions by the Department of Public Safety, with those specific functions to be determined by the Mayor and City Council by ordinance; which will not be subject to exclusive mayoral power over its establishment, maintenance, and command; and which could include licensed peace officers (police officers), if necessary, to fulfill its responsibilities for public safety, with the general nature of the amendments being briefly indicated in the explanatory note below, which is made a part of this ballot?
YES / NO
Explanatory Note:
This amendment would create a Department of Public Safety combining public safety functions through a comprehensive public health approach to be determined by the Mayor and Council. The department would be led by a Commissioner nominated by the Mayor and appointed by the Council. The Police Department, and its chief, would be removed from the City Charter. The Public Safety Department could include police officers, but the minimum funding requirement would be eliminated.
I support this amendment, and would vote yes.
Note: the post below includes embedded videos that show (non-lethal) police violence.
In 2021, both Minneapolis and Saint Paul will hold municipal races.
In Saint Paul, the ballot includes the mayoral race; a school board race (3 full-term seats, 1 partial-term seat vacated by someone moving); and a charter amendment to impose rent control.
In Minneapolis, the ballot includes the mayoral race; the city council seats (all of which will be only 2 years — there will be another city council race in 2023 due to redistricting); Park Board district seats; Park Board At Large seats (3); the Board of Estimate and Taxation; and three charter amendments (one to allow rent control, one to replace the police department with a public safety department, and one to give the mayor more power).
There are 17 candidates for mayor in Minneapolis; there are 8 candidates for mayor in Saint Paul.
AN IMPORTANT NOTE IF YOU WISH TO VOTE BY MAIL: Last year, you were able to request your ballot by filling out an online form. This year you will have to submit a downloadable form — which can still be done online, but you’ll have to download a PDF, fill it in, and e-mail it back, it’s a different and somewhat more complicated process. More here. This isn’t the Secretary of State being difficult: the actual state statute allows for absentee ballot applications to be submitted electronically “for a federal, state, or county election.” If you want “municipal” added to this, talk to your legislator.
In the meantime, I’m going to remind everyone that I had a book released this April, Chaos on CatNet. Signed copies are usually available from Dreamhaven and from the current mail-order-only incarnation of Uncle Hugo’s. Books make great holiday gifts, but should be ordered early this year — supply chain issues are happening all over.
A bunch of people have asked me why I am so concerned about Jacob Frey and developer money, I saw an online conversation involving Nekima Levy-Pounds that I wanted to talk about, and I got asked why I didn’t say more about Raymond Dehn. So whee, one. more. post.
I’m going to skip the linked list of candidates and just put my analysis below the cut.
Because various things have come out or turned up or been added to people’s websites since I first started researching the race two months ago (!) I’m doing a followup post on just the five candidates that I think might plausibly win this election.
Running (and likely to win the race) for Mayor of Minneapolis:
I’m pretty sure this is the last race I need to write up! I may revisit the mayoral races, because I’ve gotten firmer in some opinions, shakier on others.
Park Board District 6 is currently represented by Brad Bourn, who is very popular among the politically engaged progressives that flooded caucuses this year, and remarkably unpopular among his Park Board colleagues:
This was my old district. Back when I lived in Minneapolis, it was represented by Carol Kummer, who I really did not like very much. Carol finally retired four years ago, and Steffanie Musich ran unopposed.