Primary Election 2026: MN Senate, District 62

This is the seat currently held by Omar Fateh, and he has two people running against him. On the ballot:

Brenda Short
Omar Fateh
Jeanelle Austin

Brenda Short

Brenda Short ran for Mayor of Minneapolis in 2025 and does not appear to have updated her website much since then. (She changed the header, but “why am I running” leads to a page where she talks about how Minneapolis needs strong leadership (and this is true across her site, she has mostly swapped out “mayor” for “State Senate” and the 2025 dates for the 2026 dates, but she doesn’t seem to have changed much else.) Brenda is not a serious candidate (she’s the person who fired her campaign manager by giving an interview to a newspaper and waiting for the campaign manager to read the story). If you want to replace Omar Fateh, vote for Jeanelle.

Omar Fateh

Omar Fateh also ran for Mayor of Minneapolis in 2025 but with a much more serious campaign (and, no surprise here, his website now is specifically for his re-election campaign.) His legislative accomplishments include the statewide minimum wage for rideshare drivers (an 11th-hour compromise that kept the services available in Minneapolis while also ensuring that drivers were paid something closer to a fair wage), an exemption to drug paraphernalia laws for fentanyl test strips, and the North Star Promise scholarships. This spring, he introduced a bill (along with Jamie Long and Bobby Joe Champion) to allow Minnesotans to sue ICE for violating their rights; I think this passed in the Senate but died in committee in the House because the Democrats lacked a majority there. Fateh is an outstanding organizer, a good listener, and genuinely really effective in the legislature. I am disappointed that he lost to Frey because I think he’d also be a much better mayor.

Jeanelle Austin

Jeanelle Austin is the executive director of Rise & Remember, a nonprofit that maintains the memorial at George Floyd Square. (They also organize events, and offer guides for people who want to visit, among other things.) She has community service experience and strong progressive values, and iff she were running for an open seat I would probably view her as the obvious pick. But she’s not running for an open seat! She’s running against an incumbent (a young, energetic incumbent who’s done really good work so far and whose constituents have told me he’s responsive to contacts.)

I e-mailed her to ask as tactfully as I could if Omar did something bad and I missed the memo? Her reply:

My reasons for running have nothing to do with my opponents. I am fighting for issues that continue to harm our community that must be addressed at the state level of government. I believe that I will be an effective senator because of my 27 years of leadership experience, cross-cultural communication skills, and community activism. I believe many of the people in our district are in alignment with what my campaign outlines as what we need to begin to thrive—fully funded public education, improved gun laws (although I’ve learned that many neighbors vary on what this looks like), affordable healthcare for all, gainful employment for everyone, and affordable housing. It’s not the “what” that is in question, as much as it is the “how.” And it is not the policy that needs more strategy, it is the working with people. Though we in D62 need and want something, getting that something agreed upon and passed by other Minnesotans with different lived experiences is the challenge. I have the skills, experience, and imagination to serve effectively with my experience working with people. I feel called to lead through the Minnesota Senate in this next season of my life. I would be honored to be put forth by my neighbors in D62 to do so.

If you’re running for an open seat, I think that’s a reasonable way to frame it, but if you’re running in a primary against a fellow progressive Democrat, I need you (or someone else!) to be able to tell me why that person needs to be replaced. Being a state legislator is a job that comes with a learning curve: replacing a sitting legislator means a new person has to learn to do the job, re-establish the relationships, and start building up seniority. This is clearly worthwhile when someone’s been in their seat so long they’ve fossilized, or they’ve had a major scandal. I backed a prior challenger to Omar two years ago because he’d had some scandals; he got that situation straightened out and has not had any issues I’ve heard about since. (If anything, he seems to have learned from this to be extremely careful with campaign finance paperwork, etc., which is good. That’s a good thing for people to be extremely careful with.) Four years ago (note: Senate usually gets 4-year terms but they all had to run at the two-year mark because of redistricting) I backed Omar over the incumbent he was running against because he’d had a scandal.

I’ve asked around and no one seems to know of any current scandals and I’ve been told Jeanelle likes Omar fine, she just also very much wants to serve in the legislature and doesn’t want to wait for an open seat.

I like and respect Jeanelle and I hope she runs for an open seat in the future. I would vote for Omar Fateh. If you dislike Omar Fateh for whatever reason, you can definitely vote for Jeanelle; she seems pretty great. This whole race is honestly kind of perplexing.


This seems like a good year to fundraise for a trans nonprofit, so I’m fundraising this year for TIGERRS. I don’t have a Patreon, and a fundraiser lets me see in a tangible way that people value my work, which is really helpful as a motivator. (This project is a lot of work.)

I also have a new book! Obstetrix is about an obstetrician who gets kidnapped by a cult because they want someone on hand to deliver their babies; it’s a story about enduring, surviving, and not giving up. You can buy it anywhere fine books are sold, and Uncle Hugo’s, Moon Palace, and Dreamhaven all (probably) have signed copies. (I also signed copies at Next Chapter, and will be making my way to other bookstores as time allows!)

Primary Election 2026: MN Senate, District 65

This is a State Senate seat in St. Paul and West St. Paul. It is currently held by Sandy Pappas, who’s been in it since 1991. She had a serious challenger four years ago, said she wanted one final term where the DFL was in the majority, and got it. She is now retiring and two people are running in the primary:

Robyn Gulley
Natasha Bennett

Robyn is a labor organizer and former City Council member from West St. Paul. She’s also DFL-endorsed, which means that she’s been vetted by her community, and endorsed by a long list of City Council people from both St. Paul and West St. Paul. She seems fine.

Natasha Bennett is a substance abuse counselor and real estate agent. Her website has a long bio about growing up in St. Paul (“I don’t just know Saint Paul from a map—I know from lived experience”) and an extremely thin set of issues. (On her front page, under “ISSUES THAT NEED TO BE BROUGHT TO THE FOREFRONT FOR DISTRICT 65” she has a list of neighborhoods. On her issues page, she mentions affordability, “stopping corporate interests from pushing out local residents,” and wanting people to be heard.

Honestly my biggest hesitation about Natasha is this: she quotes Bible verses (well, one verse: “we walk by faith, not by sight”) absolutely everywhere: her Facebook shows her name as Natasha Walkingbyfaith Bennett, her campaign email is natashawalkbyfaithbennett at gmail.com, her LinkedIn has a truncated version of the quote plus the citation at the top (I think the omission of “faith” there was a typo). I have nothing against Christians, to be clear; some of my favorite politicians are, in fact, Christians. However, it does raise some questions for me, so I sent her an e-mail asking where she stands on abortion rights and trans rights, and also whether she has any past experience with policy work or governance type stuff. She has not replied. (I’ll note, there’s also nothing on her website or her campaign Facebook that addresses either of these questions.)

I would vote for Robyn!


This seems like a good year to fundraise for a trans nonprofit, so I’m fundraising this year for TIGERRS. I don’t have a Patreon, and a fundraiser lets me see in a tangible way that people value my work, which is really helpful as a motivator. (This project is a lot of work.)

I also have a new book! Obstetrix is about an obstetrician who gets kidnapped by a cult because they want someone on hand to deliver their babies; it’s a story about enduring, surviving, and not giving up. You can buy it anywhere fine books are sold, and Uncle Hugo’s, Moon Palace, and Dreamhaven all (probably) have signed copies. (I also signed copies at Next Chapter, and will be making my way to other bookstores as time allows!)

Primary Election 2026: US House, District 4

This is the seat currently held by Betty McCollum. On the DFL side of the ballot:

Betty McCollum
Aswar Rahman

On the Republican side:

Gene Rechtzigel
Paul Wikstrom
Paul Xiong

(Minnesota doesn’t require you to register as a party member to vote in primaries, but in any given primary, you have to pick one party and stick with it throughout. My friends who work as election judges have people who want to litigate this every single time. If you vote in more than one party’s races, you have spoiled your ballot.)

I live in St. Paul, so Betty McCollum is my US House Rep. She’s in the progressive wing of the Democratic party but is not as fighty as some of the other people in that part of the party (like Ilhan) if that makes sense. For example, she’s a long-standing critic of Israel (she’s literally one of the longest-standing supporters of Palestinian human rights in Congress) but sticks with moderate language while talking about Israel’s war crimes (she prefers the term “human rights abuses”).

My personal recent frustrations with Betty: she voted last week for the KIDS Act, which is an Internet censorship / age-verification bill. (There are a lot of problems with age-verification bills; one is that they’re basically data-exposure bills.) She voted last month for the “Combating Organized Retail Crime Act” bill, which expands the criteria where shoplifting can be federally prosecuted. (This bill is 100% a response to the claim that we’re in an “organized retail theft epidemic” which is just horseshit. Or possibly it’s 50% that, 50% an opportunity for the Feds to increase surveillance. Both are bad!) She’s a Democrat in a safe seat and did not have to vote for these.

Anyway, if you’re here because you are mad about these votes (or other things she’s done) and you want to cast a protest vote, and you just want to know if Aswar Rahman is evil: no, he’s not evil, you can totally vote for him if you want. ETA: HEY FRIENDS I’M BACK THREE DAYS AFTER I POSTED WITH SOME EXCITING NEW INFORMATION.

So there’s a lot I am going to need to add, but I’m just going to drop in a screen shot of the flyer his campaign apparently sent out last year.

A photo of a flyer. On the left side it says, "Aswar Rahman is challenging anti-Israel Rep. Betty McCollum in the MN CD4 Democratic Primary" and there's a photo of him in tie and vest. On the right side it says, "I need your help to defeat the most anti-Israel Democrat in Congress. My name is Aswar Rahman. I am a Minnesota Democrat, a businessman, a humanitarian serving Ukraine, and Betty McCollum's primary opponent. She's a 20-year incumbent of MN's 4th District who:

* spent decades trying to restrict US aid to Israel,
* branded supporters of the US-Israel alliance as members of "hate groups,"
* led the charge to deny Ukrainians the weapons they need to defend themselves and win the fight.

It's time for McCollum to go. If you help me, I will defeat her in the Democratic primary, and be a champion for America's democratic allies.

Needless to say, nothing like this is on his website now. (He now has the following, under Gaza: “I strongly support halting arms supplies to Israel, mandating war crimes investigations for the Netanyahu regime, and replacing the corrupt ‘Board of Peace’ with a UN-led coalition to path the way for democratic elections and Palestinian statehood.”

Anyway I’m putting that up top because honestly, that’s all a lot of people will need to know. You can stop reading and go vote for Betty (or, if you’re Team Israel, for Aswar.) I’ll be back with more edits in a bit, I’m now returning you to the original post and also nesting it under a cut for the convenience of people scrolling my site; this got long.

Continue reading →